![]() The start of her sloppy lack of editing.ģ. I don't like how this book isolates itself from non-Catholic fans as I already explained.Ģ. ![]() But there were certain things I definitely did not like.ġ. The plot itself isn't too bad and for the most part Lestat still behaves like himself (unlike that being in Blood Canticle). Anne Rice, today, hints that it was all real. For a while it's unclear whether Lestat really went on this journey or if he had some sort of break down or was tricked by powerful spirits in an elaborate illusion. An eye got ripped out but he manages to get it back later. Lestat goes on a journey of Heaven and Hell and comes back quite worse for ware. Now for a lot of people it seems Lestat exists in a solely Catholic mythos, completely segregating the non-Catholic fans who had liked to imagine Lestat in their reality. People of any religious background could see Lestat existing in their own real world. There was no certainty as to who or what created the universe, just like our world. The character of Lestat existed in a world that could easily be our own. ![]() I just feel it would have been better if Anne Rice wrote this as a stand alone novel without using her pre-established characters. The Devil tells his side of things to a vampire. ![]() It's not so much that Memnoch The Devil has a bad premise. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |